Hello,

...while the move towards stablecoin transactions is promising, it is not yet a viable standalone solution for managing the financial needs of all projects due to the limited availability of these funds.

Then let's increase the availability of stable coin assets in the treasury.

It underscores the continued necessity for the Treasury Insurance Fund to manage the volatility associated with DOT and to ensure projects receive adequate funding regardless of market conditions.

No, it doesn't.

Additionally, it is important to consider the timing and strategic implications of transitioning significant treasury reserves into stablecoins, particularly at the onset of a market upturn.

Then please start an initiative for the community to consult on how to effectively manage asset diversity.

Nay.

Regards,
kukabi | Helikon

there is the new spend() extrinsic to pay out in USDT. If proposers don't want uncertainty, this is what they should do. This bounty would just add complexity to a process that can be handled much simpler