Polkassembly Logo

Head 1
Head 3
Head 4
Head 2
Create Pencil IconCreate
TRACKS
ORIGINS
Report an issueNeed help with something?
Foot 1
Foot 2
Foot 3
Foot 4
OpenGov
View All Big Spender
Requested:368.02K DOT
Executed

Untitled Post

inBig Spender
a year ago
BeneficiaryBeneficiary:

(368.02K DOT)

This is a ReferendumV2 post. It can only be edited by the proposer of the post .

Comments (2)

a year ago

Thank you for the proposal. Client diversity cannot be compromised. However, it's clear from the announcements and presentations on JAM so far that a relay chain implementation is probably going to be made redundant by the forthcoming development efforts. Spending more funds on an unfinished relay chain client implementation seems to be a futile effort, in my humble opinion. I would be happy to change my vote according to direction from the technical leadership of the relay chain efforts, but until then my vote is nay.

Please let me know if you are in contact with the development team regarding this proposal's position in the light of the coming transition.

Best regards,
kukabi | Helikon

a year ago

Should be great to change the name or at least to something more easy to remember or more standard like polkadot-js polkadot-py polkadot-go in this particular case

PleaseLogin to comment

Proposal Passed

3

of 3

Summary

0%

Aye

AyeNay

0%

Nay

Aye (59)0.0 DOT

Support0.0 DOT

Nay (46)0.0 DOT

Voting Data

Approval%

Support%

Threshold0.00%

Threshold0.00%

Help Center

Report an Issue
Feedback
Terms and Conditions
Github

Our Services

Docs
Terms of Website
Privacy Policy

A House of Commons Initiative.

Polka Labs Private Limited 2025

All rights reserved.

Terms and ConditionsTerms of Website
Privacy Policy