View All Big SpenderinBig Spender
Beneficiary:(368.02K DOT)
Requested:368.02K DOT
Executed
Untitled Post
a year ago
This is a ReferendumV2 post. It can only be edited by the proposer of the post .
Comments (2)
Proposal Passed
3
of 3Summary
0%
Aye
0%
Nay
Aye (59)0.0 DOT
Support0.0 DOT
Nay (46)0.0 DOT
Voting Data
Approval%
Support%
Threshold0.00%
Threshold0.00%
Thank you for the proposal. Client diversity cannot be compromised. However, it's clear from the announcements and presentations on JAM so far that a relay chain implementation is probably going to be made redundant by the forthcoming development efforts. Spending more funds on an unfinished relay chain client implementation seems to be a futile effort, in my humble opinion. I would be happy to change my vote according to direction from the technical leadership of the relay chain efforts, but until then my vote is nay.
Please let me know if you are in contact with the development team regarding this proposal's position in the light of the coming transition.
Best regards,
kukabi | Helikon
Should be great to change the name or at least to something more easy to remember or more standard like polkadot-js polkadot-py polkadot-go in this particular case