View All Big SpenderinBig Spender
Beneficiary:(1M DOT)
Requested:1M DOT
Rejected
Untitled Post
a year ago
Beneficiary:This is a ReferendumV2 post. It can only be edited by the proposer of the post .
Comments (2)
Confirmation Period
3
of 3Decision Period
28 / 28 days
Confirmation Period
0 / 7 days
Summary
0%
Aye
0%
Nay
Aye (69)0.0 DOT
Support0.0 DOT
Nay (240)0.0 DOT
Voting Data
Approval%
Support%
Threshold0.00%
Threshold0.00%
Hello from Polkadotters!
Can you provide us with the proper budget layout? We want to be sure that the amount of 10 mil. USD is justified.
We understand, that the Chainalysis integration might lead to a higher level of adoption of Polkadot in TradFi, which can be beneficial for tokenholders and for those institutions as well. But in the other hand, funding Chainalysis and its solution goes against the decentralized ethos. We will consider our vote within the next few days.
Can you please also elaborate on answers for previous questions by other teams/entities/individuals such as Velocity Labs, or OnlyDeFiGuy?
The Acala Parachain suffered two substantial events that resulted in exploited funds:
Will this tooling eventually allow us to identify where all the exploited funds ended up?
Will the tooling be able to investigate crimes that occurred in the past on kusama, polkadot and their respective parachains?