Hello from Polkadotters!
Retroactive funding seems to be exactly the way it should be for things like wallets and their development and similar types of things. But we have a few questions that you would like to answer.

• Some of the GitHub links seem to be blind (previous release versions etc.), so please check it out and fix it, so we can go through them.
• As an ex-user of Manta Signer, I would like to ask if Manta Signer is considered a previous version of Manta Wallet, and if so, is its development also funded by this referendum?
• Is Manta Wallet focusing only on Calamari, or also on Manta Atlantic or Manta Pacific?
• What's the actual state of Manta Wallet and what about further development? And why is the funding just till Sept 2023?
  Thanks in advance for your answers.

Hello from Polkadotters.
Although we are fans of ZK technology and privacy-respectful products, after considering all aspects, we decided to vote NAY, due to the fact, that there is no other usage for this extension wallet, rather than Manta parachain (and Calamari). If this wallet would be used for various parachains or projects, that would be a different story.