Dear team,

We agree with @ROTKO.NET here in regards of the need to have better insights at the p2p levels so the overall networking mechanism can be improved, however, the sample report shown is somehow too "executive" for the goal...

We are voting Aye with the expectation of seeing lees aggregated data in the report and more nitty-gritty analyses which are actionable (e.g. main causes for disconnection, problems in bidirectional reachability, peer discovery obstacles, aspects hindering network latencies, problems with old peer retention in tables, etc).. all of those seemingly complex enough and volatile enough that cannot be automated in a report like the one shown.

ALSO, IMPORTANT!: please make sure that your accounts have verified on-chain identities and that the decision deposit is also covered.

Best of luck and please bring on your magnifier glass to the p2p network!

Milos

Hello from Polkadotters!
Please consider fully verifying your identity, right now your identity is without judgment. This will make your suggestion more trustworthy.
This is an interesting initiative, we will dig a bit into it and consider voting in the next few days.