Hi @giottodf,

I'm nay'ing this proposal in favor of private investor funding. Yet, when you're presenting a proposal such as this one, you owe the community clarity on the details. Who decides which private investor is going to be picked? Who's going to carry out the negotiations? Who's going to oversee the investment process? By "some tokens", how much do you imply? For all of these decisions, we're likely going to require additional referenda, because the treasury has already invested a million USD in this effort.

So I'm going nay for the lack of a "we need more details" option. This proposal is incomplete for what it is now.

To close with, I would approve the option of private investor funding under the condition of complete transparency of the process details.

Best regards,
kukabi | Helikon