Polkassembly Logo

Head 1
Head 3
Head 4
Head 2
Create Pencil IconCreate
TRACKS
ORIGINS
Report an issueNeed help with something?
Foot 1
Foot 2
Foot 3
Foot 4
OpenGov
View All Big Spender
Requested:171.83K DOT
Executed

Untitled Post

inBig Spender
a year ago
BeneficiaryBeneficiary:

(171.83K DOT)

This is a ReferendumV2 post. It can only be edited by the proposer of the post .

Comments (1)

a year ago

I did an interview with the Token Terminal team covering Polkadot almost a year ago: https://twitter.com/tokenterminal/status/1661371959018504194

I had a great experience working with the team, and they seemed to be focused on the right questions and details for Polkadot. From what I can tell, this team is not trying to shill BS metrics which plague the blockchain space, but actually try to find insight into the right metrics and data needed to identify high quality projects in our space, and for the future of Web3.

If I had a criticism of Token Terminal today, it is that they are not well suited to capture the true metrics for many of the next generation blockchains like Polkadot. For example representing Polkadot not as its own blockchain with TVL, TPS, User Activity, etc... but as a security hub, data availability layer, and cross chain messaging platform for dozens of connected chains.

With their partnership with the Parity Data team, I am confident the Token Terminal team will be able to represent Polkadot fairly, and gain new insight into how they should be evaluating next generation blockchain scaling solutions.

PleaseLogin to comment

Proposal Passed

3

of 3

Summary

0%

Aye

AyeNay

0%

Nay

Aye (143)0.0 DOT

Support0.0 DOT

Nay (11)0.0 DOT

Voting Data

Approval%

Support%

Threshold0.00%

Threshold0.00%

Help Center

Report an Issue
Feedback
Terms and Conditions
Github

Our Services

Docs
Terms of Website
Privacy Policy

A House of Commons Initiative.

Polka Labs Private Limited 2025

All rights reserved.

Terms and ConditionsTerms of Website
Privacy Policy