View All Small SpenderinSmall Spender
Beneficiary:(5.99K DOT)
Requested:5.99K DOT
Rejected
Untitled Post
a year ago
This is a ReferendumV2 post. It can only be edited by the proposer of the post .
Comments (2)
Confirmation Period
3
of 3Decision Period
28 / 28 days
Confirmation Period
0 / 2 days
Summary
0%
Aye
0%
Nay
Aye (8)0.0 DOT
Support0.0 DOT
Nay (158)0.0 DOT
Voting Data
Approval%
Support%
Threshold0.00%
Threshold0.00%
Hi @ALTCOINDAILY,
First of all, I'm very disappointed (though not surprised, unfortunately) to see that the treasury has already paid you $110K for the three YouTube videos you shared in your post. I usually reject content proposals, because they're mostly very basic unintelligent parroted shill content, and your last proposal is a monumental example of it. It wouldn't have been so terrible at a much lower price tag, like $1K for all 3 videos, for instance. So in my opinion, you 110x over-charged the treasury, it's up to the community to how to call this act.
Although I have a very high opinion of Talisman, your proposal is a very easy nay for me, basically because I see absolutely no point at such outrageous cost, a whopping $55K with today's rate for a single video.
Regards,
kukabi | Helikon