Polkassembly Logo

Head 1
Head 3
Head 4
Head 2
Create Pencil IconCreate
TRACKS
ORIGINS
Report an issueNeed help with something?
Foot 1
Foot 2
Foot 3
Foot 4
OpenGov
View All Big Spender
Requested:172.07K DOT
Executed

Untitled Post

inBig Spender
a year ago
BeneficiaryBeneficiary:

(172.07K DOT)

This is a ReferendumV2 post. It can only be edited by the proposer of the post .

Comments (2)

a year ago

Though polkassembly and related governance tools are important to the ecosystem, this team is becoming more and more greedy. Their expenses are keep growing dramatically, but products UX/UI is just so so, not competitive.

a year ago

Hi @Polkassembly,

Although it's clear that Polkassembly plays a crucial role in OpenGov alongside Subsquare, I believe the budget requested is excessive. I don't understand why you should be charging extra for the new features when you already have a crowded personnel listed solely for maintenance. Furthermore, I'm noticing a trend of escalating costs with each proposal from Polkassembly, a point highlighted by ChaosDAO. Moreover, I don't understand why the treasury should be funding your travel and accommodation costs for the events.

My vote is nay, with the primary concern that Polkassembly's expenses are becoming increasingly heavy on the treasury. I would vote in favor of a proposal with a more modest and reasonable budget and a shorter duration.

Best regards,
kukabi | Helikon

PleaseLogin to comment

Proposal Passed

3

of 3

Summary

0%

Aye

AyeNay

0%

Nay

Aye (216)0.0 DOT

Support0.0 DOT

Nay (16)0.0 DOT

Voting Data

Approval%

Support%

Threshold0.00%

Threshold0.00%

Help Center

Report an Issue
Feedback
Terms and Conditions
Github

Our Services

Docs
Terms of Website
Privacy Policy

A House of Commons Initiative.

Polka Labs Private Limited 2025

All rights reserved.

Terms and ConditionsTerms of Website
Privacy Policy