View All Big SpenderinBig Spender
Beneficiary:(172.07K DOT)
Requested:172.07K DOT
Executed
Untitled Post
a year ago
This is a ReferendumV2 post. It can only be edited by the proposer of the post .
Comments (2)
Proposal Passed
3
of 3Summary
0%
Aye
0%
Nay
Aye (216)0.0 DOT
Support0.0 DOT
Nay (16)0.0 DOT
Voting Data
Approval%
Support%
Threshold0.00%
Threshold0.00%
Though polkassembly and related governance tools are important to the ecosystem, this team is becoming more and more greedy. Their expenses are keep growing dramatically, but products UX/UI is just so so, not competitive.
Hi @Polkassembly,
Although it's clear that Polkassembly plays a crucial role in OpenGov alongside Subsquare, I believe the budget requested is excessive. I don't understand why you should be charging extra for the new features when you already have a crowded personnel listed solely for maintenance. Furthermore, I'm noticing a trend of escalating costs with each proposal from Polkassembly, a point highlighted by ChaosDAO. Moreover, I don't understand why the treasury should be funding your travel and accommodation costs for the events.
My vote is nay, with the primary concern that Polkassembly's expenses are becoming increasingly heavy on the treasury. I would vote in favor of a proposal with a more modest and reasonable budget and a shorter duration.
Best regards,
kukabi | Helikon