Polkassembly Logo

Head 1
Head 3
Head 4
Head 2
Create Pencil IconCreate
TRACKS
ORIGINS
Report an issueNeed help with something?
Foot 1
Foot 2
Foot 3
Foot 4
OpenGov
View All Small Spender
Requested:6.66K DOT
Executed

Untitled Post

inSmall Spender
2 years ago
BeneficiaryBeneficiary:

(6.66K DOT)

This is a ReferendumV2 post. It can only be edited by the proposer of the post .

Comments (3)

2 years ago

Dear Polkadot Community,

We genuinely seek to hear your voice. Whether you support or oppose our proposal, your opinions are highly valued and welcomed. Each piece of advice and concern you provide will greatly aid us in better understanding the community's needs and expectations, and will guide us in making necessary adjustments to our project.

Thank you once again for your valuable time and feedback. We look forward to continuing our dialogue with the community and are committed to collaboratively advancing the development of the Polkadot ecosystem.

2 years ago

Hi @ZeroDAO

Please help me understand why is it beneficial to Polkadot to make life easier to competing L1 chains?

If the relevant projects want to implement such capabilities, then would it not be easier to develop their solutions directly in Polkadot?

I am not very fond on patching [insert your preferred adjetive, or expletive, here] technology (i.e. BTC, ETH) when the same use-cases would be better catered in Polkadot.

Your thoughts?

Thanks again!!

Milos

Load more comments
PleaseLogin to comment

Proposal Passed

3

of 3

Summary

0%

Aye

AyeNay

0%

Nay

Aye (77)0.0 DOT

Support0.0 DOT

Nay (110)0.0 DOT

Voting Data

Approval%

Support%

Threshold0.00%

Threshold0.00%

Help Center

Report an Issue
Feedback
Terms and Conditions
Github

Our Services

Docs
Terms of Website
Privacy Policy

A House of Commons Initiative.

Polka Labs Private Limited 2025

All rights reserved.

Terms and ConditionsTerms of Website
Privacy Policy