What happens in cases where a proposal is made that deliberately violates the law in some way? When there is a question of guilt/liability it may become important to know which accounts have voted which way. Project Glove obscures that information possibly casting doubts on good actors while emboldening bad actors who are now less likely to have their account associated with the violation.

Thank you for this thoughtful question!

Project Glove does not obscure the identity of a wallet any more or less than Polkadot does, it only obscures voting directions and amounts, and it only obscures that from the public, not from the gov proxy operator.

Establishing terms of use covering the scenarios you mention or limiting liability associated with the voting behavior of Glove participants is a decision that is likely to be taken on an operator-by-operator basis.

Some may insist on a terms of use, whereas others may not, depending on a number of factors such as jurisdiction, risk appetite and general preferences.