Polkassembly Logo

Head 1
Head 3
Head 4
Head 2
Create Pencil IconCreate
TRACKS
ORIGINS
Report an issueNeed help with something?
Foot 1
Foot 2
Foot 3
Foot 4
OpenGov
View All Medium Spender
Requested:38.68K DOT
Rejected

Untitled Post

inMedium Spender
2 years ago
BeneficiaryBeneficiary:

(38.68K DOT)

This is a ReferendumV2 post. It can only be edited by the proposer of the post .

Comments (1)

2 years ago

I am not a fan of pushing out more 'content creators' that have already established platforms. If you like Polkadot, don't hold it hostage, why not show us your passion first? Build some content and clout here first, then perhaps we can talk, plus we have people already making a buissnes of covering Polkadot. See Kusamarian - https://www.youtube.com/c/JayChrawnna or Alphaairdrop - https://www.youtube.com/@alphaairdrop

If CRYPTO BANTER's proposal can't explain 'WHY' and 'HOW' it would be different, other than just bringing in more 'Wen Moon' bois, I'd seriously reconsider. If the proposed content can cover what's being missed by other creators already doing a fantastic job that would be helpful. IMO we dont need 'Numbers go up' clickbait. Otherwise, why not help push some of Polkadots own creators, build trust here? I think I know why...

If we look at CRYPTO BANTER's top videos, hardly any are about Polkadot. If it is about Polkadot, there is very little substance and it's mostly just speculating...

Looks like it's a Nay for me.

PleaseLogin to comment

Confirmation Period

3

of 3

Decision Period

28 / 28 days

Confirmation Period

0 / 4 days

Summary

0%

Aye

AyeNay

0%

Nay

Aye (106)0.0 DOT

Support0.0 DOT

Nay (473)0.0 DOT

Voting Data

Approval%

Support%

Threshold0.00%

Threshold0.00%

Help Center

Report an Issue
Feedback
Terms and Conditions
Github

Our Services

Docs
Terms of Website
Privacy Policy

A House of Commons Initiative.

Polka Labs Private Limited 2025

All rights reserved.

Terms and ConditionsTerms of Website
Privacy Policy