View All Medium SpenderinMedium Spender
Beneficiary:(239.4K USDT)
Requested:239.4K USDT
Deciding
[Proposal retracted] Please vote nay
6 days ago
Beneficiary:We’ve decided to retract this proposal after community feedback around the Fellowship UI RFP. The features we scoped here will still be built and shipped to users, this pause is only to restructure how funding aligns with the broader roadmap.
For now, we kindly ask you to vote NAY . Fret not, the work continues, the changelogs keep coming, and we’ll be back soon with a clearer, better-aligned proposal with some features shipped and concerns resolved in entirety.
Think of this as us hitting “refactor” on funding, not on delivery.
Thanks
Polkassembly Team
Comments (2)
Observations:
We're still waiting for these requests from 7 months ago (years if the original concerned comments were considered). The delegates page seemingly is completely lacks development interest and the ranking is broken despite it being a first level hyperlink.
https://i.ibb.co/7dTF8k29/meme.png)
https://i.ibb.co/xqB4JQ87/meme2.png
It was the top concern
https://polkadot.polkassembly.io/post/2772#comment-J3QVlguqNIOjLY2jjCrI
Curious to hear why the 100k fellowship work is charged here as well as on referendum 373
https://polkadot.subsquare.io/referenda/373
Didn't this referendum cover that already?
A claim that it doesn't overlap with 1463 is extremely confusing specially when you consider the title of "social contract" as this should be "new features"
This is the original comment regarding that:
"No overlap commitment Ref. 1463 covers platform maintenance and operations for the entire year ( Jan- Dec 2025)."
The global analytics page remains lacking
https://polkadot.polkassembly.io/gov-analytics
The bounty page displays erroneous information (0 child bounties):
https://i.ibb.co/nM73GT8y/bounty1.png
https://ibb.co/XfMbySwn
This one in particular has activity on chain
https://polkadot.subsquare.io/treasury/bounties/52
The same goes for bounty 63 and so on.
Other issues remain visible on the website, hopefully those get addressed first.
Personally I don't see the need for another fellowship UI. There is no need to have 2 UIs for not that many people.
There is also a RFP to apply for funding for the Fellowship UI, so this doesn't need to go through main treasury.