Saxemberg has voted AYE on the Polkadot referendum 1741. Polkawatch, Decentralization Analytics [...] 2025. A cornerstone for decentralization verification for validators and pools. If a negative vote from others is given, we recommend resubmitting in stables.
Vote overrule process:
https://voting.opensquare.io/space/the-sax-guild/proposal/QmdRnP9ePNxmsPXGFxAsjeHkaJRw8GHsnCgJACULUWFNzS

Dear Proposer,

Thank you for your proposal. Our second vote on this proposal is AYE.

The Small Spender track requires 50% participation and simple majority of non-abstain votes according to our voting policy v0.2, and any referendum in which the majority of members vote abstain receives an abstain vote. This proposal has received two aye and zero nay votes from eight available members, with three members abstaining. Below is a summary of our members' comments:

Some voters expressed concern over the handling of fiat expenses and technical uncertainties. A few changed their vote to abstain because they believed the proposer should consider stablecoin requests for predictable costs, rather than solely relying on DOT. They stressed that the minor amount requested was less important than setting a good precedent. Other comments highlighted the project’s significant contributions to tracking validator decentralization and enhancing analytics infrastructure. These members acknowledged the benefits of the current funding approach, noting that predictable costs justified using DOT for operational hours while suggesting that future proposals might better align expenses with stablecoin funding. Overall, the funding for 2025 received support despite these reservations.

The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.

Please feel free to contact us through the links below for further discussion.

Kind regards,
Permanence DAO
Decentralized Voices Cohort IV Delegate

📅 Book Office Hours
💬 Public Telegram
🌐️ Web
🐦 Twitter
🗳️ Delegate