Polkassembly Logo

Head 1
Head 3
Head 4
Head 2
Create Pencil IconCreate
TRACKS
ORIGINS
Report an issueNeed help with something?
Foot 1
Foot 2
Foot 3
Foot 4
OpenGov
View All Medium Spender
Requested:312.5K USDC
Executed

Replace and Recover Failed Treasury Spend

inMedium Spender
2 months ago
BeneficiaryBeneficiary:

(312.5K USDC)

This proposal is to replace and recover a failed treasury spend that Snowbridge submitted earlier this year. The spend was for a past proposal that failed because at the time when it was claimed, there was not enough USDC in the Asset Hub treasury.

The claim extrinsic was successfully submitted to Polkadot, but then when the XCM was sent to AssetHub to transfer the funds, the transfer failed due to insufficient USDC.

Unfortunately, we cannot retry the claim since Polkadot marked it as successful, even though the XCM failed.

The original approved treasury spend is here: https://polkadot.subscan.io/treasury_spend/29

The treasury.spend extrinsic that succeeded on Polkadot: https://polkadot.subscan.io/extrinsic/25613045-2?tab=event

The corresponding XCM message that was processed (and failed) on AssetHub due to insufficient USDC: https://assethub-polkadot.subscan.io/block/8652209?tab=event&event=8652209-7 - the XCM message queue was processed correctly, but within the event one can see that the message itself was not successful.

This proposal creates a new spend, the same as the original one, ie, 312,500 USDC

Comments (2)

1 days ago

Dear Proposer,

Thank you for your proposal. Our first vote on this proposal is AYE.

The Medium Spender track requires 50% quorum (at least 5 aye votes) and simple majority of non-abstain votes according to our voting policy v0.2, and any referendum in which the majority of members vote abstain receives an abstain vote. This proposal has received five aye and zero nay votes from ten available members. Below is a summary of our members' comments:

The voters expressed unanimous support by affirming that the proposal justified fulfilling the previously approved treasury payment despite technical setbacks. They argued that rectifying the failed asset transfer was necessary to honor commitments made in earlier proposals. The comments highlighted that even though administrative errors led to an unsuccessful payment execution, addressing the issue was fair and essential to uphold past approvals. The decision was driven by a shared belief in the importance of meeting contractual obligations and recovering funds, ensuring that the work previously endorsed was appropriately compensated despite the encountered challenges.

The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.

Please feel free to contact us through the links below for further discussion.

Kind regards,
Permanence DAO
Decentralized Voices Cohort IV Delegate

📅 Book Office Hours
💬 Public Telegram
🌐️ Web
🐦 Twitter
🗳️ Delegate

1 days ago

test

PleaseLogin to comment

Proposal Passed

3

of 3

Summary

0%

Aye

AyeNay

0%

Nay

Aye (63)0.0 DOT

Support0.0 DOT

Nay (9)0.0 DOT

Voting Data

Approval%

Support%

Threshold0.00%

Threshold0.00%

Help Center

Report an Issue
Feedback
Terms and Conditions
Github

Our Services

Docs
Terms of Website
Privacy Policy

A House of Commons Initiative.

Polka Labs Private Limited 2025

All rights reserved.

Terms and ConditionsTerms of Website
Privacy Policy