Polkassembly Logo

Head 1
Head 3
Head 4
Head 2
Create Pencil IconCreate
TRACKS
ORIGINS
Report an issueNeed help with something?
Foot 1
Foot 2
Foot 3
Foot 4
OpenGov
View All Small Tipper
Requested:916.46 USDT
Executed

Ambassador Fellowship Tooling: Personal Reimbursement Request

inSmall Tipper
2 months ago
BeneficiaryBeneficiary:

(916.46 USDT)

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1oJ5J_IbjdU8AuvJiNk8NT5k37S1N1WCn?usp=drive_link

Screenshot 2025-06-17 at 14.32.25.png

On 26 March 2025, the Ambassador Fellowship Advisory Board that was in place for the Establishment and Incubation Phases (now know as Genesis Cycle) asked me to lead the operations to a successful close by 3 May 2025.

From this point onwards, I had no resources available to me - people or finances.

I have been funding the Ambassador tooling since 31 March 2025. I am requesting reimbursement for this expenditure. I have noted when the various accounts will stop being paid from my personal account and will work with the Fellowship to find another way to continue the tooling.

In the absence of an optimistic payment mechanism, I am forced to come to OpenGov for these expenses. There will follow a second proposal for compensation for the work done. This will signal the end of that phase.

Thank you for bearing with this process.

Comments (2)

44 days ago

Dear Proposer,

Thank you for your proposal. Our second vote on this proposal is NAY.

The Small Tipper track requires 30% participation and simple majority of non-abstain votes according to our voting policy v0.2, and any referendum in which the majority of members vote abstain receives an abstain vote. This proposal has received one aye and six nay votes from ten available members, with one member abstaining. Below is a summary of our members' comments:

Some voters abstained or voted against the proposal, questioning the rationale behind covering software subscriptions for a compensated program head and expressing concerns about the lack of consultation with OpenGov. Others believed that reasonable compensation was justified. Overall, the discussion highlighted differing views on the appropriateness of funding certain expenses and the necessity of transparency in decision-making processes.

The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.

Please feel free to contact us through the links below for further discussion.

Kind regards,
Permanence DAO
Decentralized Voices Cohort IV Delegate

📅 Book Office Hours
💬 Public Telegram
🌐️ Web
🐦 Twitter
🗳️ Delegate

42 days ago

PolkaWorld votes AYE

Regardless of how the Ambassador Program was run, we believe that these out-of-pocket expenses — especially for tooling — are eligible for reimbursement by the Treasury.

By the time of voting, this proposal had already passed. We’re leaving this comment here simply to share our perspective.

You can view the full feedback here.

PleaseLogin to comment

Proposal Passed

3

of 3

Summary

0%

Aye

AyeNay

0%

Nay

Aye (20)0.0 DOT

Support0.0 DOT

Nay (23)0.0 DOT

Voting Data

Approval%

Support%

Threshold0.00%

Threshold0.00%

Help Center

Report an Issue
Feedback
Terms and Conditions
Github

Our Services

Docs
Terms of Website
Privacy Policy

A House of Commons Initiative.

Polka Labs Private Limited 2025

All rights reserved.

Terms and ConditionsTerms of Website
Privacy Policy