Quick question guys (i love what you from the beginning, long time supporter, i've just bought the air quality censor by the way):
Did you contact the Marketing Bounty before posting on OpenGov?

It seems that it would fit perfectly with the MB.

Dear Proposer,

Thank you for your proposal. Our first vote on this proposal is NAY.

The Medium Spender track requires 50% quorum and simple majority of non-abstain voters according to our voting policy v0.2, and any referendum in which the majority of members vote abstain receives an abstain vote. This proposal has received one aye and four nay votes from ten available members, with two members abstaining. Below is a summary of our members' comments:

The referendum elicited mixed responses from voters regarding the proposal for funding a web3 project. Some expressed support, highlighting the potential for innovation and community backing, while others raised concerns about the project's alignment with the common good and the effectiveness of its marketing strategy. Critics pointed out issues such as unrealistic cost-per-click assumptions, the necessity of using third-party agencies, and an outdated influencer approach. A few voters abstained, citing uncertainty about the proposal's benefits to the Polkadot ecosystem. Overall, opinions varied significantly.

The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.

Please feel free to contact us through the links below for further discussion.

Kind regards,
Permanence DAO
Decentralized Voices Cohort IV Delegate

📅 Book Office Hours
💬 Public Telegram
🌐️ Web
🐦 Twitter
🗳️ Delegate