Polkassembly Logo

Head 1
Head 3
Head 4
Head 2
Create Pencil IconCreate
TRACKS
ORIGINS
Report an issueNeed help with something?
Foot 1
Foot 2
Foot 3
Foot 4
OpenGov
View All Treasurer
Requested:1.03M DOT
Executed

IBP Bounty Top-Up

inTreasurer
4 months ago
BeneficiaryBeneficiary:

(1.03M DOT)

Summary:
The Infrastructure Builders Program (IBP) is a collective of independent infrastructure service providers that supports the Polkadot ecosystem and its parachains with RPC and ‘IT department’ services. Established in 2022, IBP is a globally distributed and resilient ecosystem service provider, thanks to its unique design. This proposal seeks to secure continued funding for the services it provides to the ecosystem.

!Note!:
The requested amount is a top-up for the IBP bounty, which is managed by five Polkadot-native curators. The IBP bounty pays compensation for the services provided only retroactively. The amount is for the theoretical max deployment capacity. Actual annualized cost was $2,490,996 for 552 Relay and System-chain and 154 Parachain RPC nodes

RPC services are all paid retroactively for delivered services monthly by USD value.

See the Full Proposal here

Edit:
Various ecosystem members have provided feedback and IBP services will not be offered to ecosystem participants that have, beyond all doubt, defrauded the treasury.

Comments (2)

3 months ago

Dear Proposer,

Thank you for your proposal. Our first vote on this proposal is NAY.

The Treasurer track requires 60% quorum (6 ayes from 10 members) according to our voting policy v0.1. This proposal has received three aye and two nay votes from ten members, with five members abstaining. Below is a summary of our members' comments:

Several voters chose to abstain due to conflicts of interest or concerns about the cost-effectiveness of treasury funds for the proposed program. Supporters emphasized its crucial role in the decentralization and ongoing success of the network, advocating for continued funding. Conversely, some expressed skepticism, questioning the lack of transparency regarding cloud service comparisons and the potential for inefficiencies. Overall, the community displayed a mix of support and hesitation, reflecting a desire for clarity and accountability in the funding process.

The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.

Please feel free to contact us through the links below for further discussion.

DISCLAIMER: Our Decentralized Voices delegation account voted to abstain on this referendum in accordance with our conflict of interest policy, announced on the 27th of March, 2025.

Kind regards,
Permanence DAO
Decentralized Voices Cohort IV Delegate

📅 Book Office Hours
💬 Public Telegram
🌐️ Web
🐦 Twitter
🗳️ Delegate

3 months ago

On behalf of Trustless Core DV and as a consequence of the impossibility to issue feedback from that account, the corresponding feedback is presented:

"Dear Proposer,
Thank you for the proposal.
Trustless Core has voted AYE. Our team supports this proposal, which seeks to secure continued funding for the services it provides to the ecosystem through the Infrastructure Builders Program, a globally distributed and resilient ecosystem service provider.
Best regards,
Trustless Core"

https://x.com/trustlesscore/status/1914376045060378706

PleaseLogin to comment

Proposal Passed

3

of 3

Summary

0%

Aye

AyeNay

0%

Nay

Aye (82)0.0 DOT

Support0.0 DOT

Nay (13)0.0 DOT

Voting Data

Approval%

Support%

Threshold0.00%

Threshold0.00%

Help Center

Report an Issue
Feedback
Terms and Conditions
Github

Our Services

Docs
Terms of Website
Privacy Policy

A House of Commons Initiative.

Polka Labs Private Limited 2025

All rights reserved.

Terms and ConditionsTerms of Website
Privacy Policy