View All Medium SpenderinMedium Spender
Beneficiary:(272.5K USDC)
Requested:272.5K USDC
Rejected
Untitled Post
5 months ago
This is a ReferendumV2 post. It can only be edited by the proposer of the post .
Comments (3)
Confirmation Period
3
of 3Decision Period
28 / 28 days
Confirmation Period
0 / 4 days
Summary
0%
Aye
0%
Nay
Aye (25)0.0 DOT
Support0.0 DOT
Nay (78)0.0 DOT
Voting Data
Approval%
Support%
Threshold0.00%
Threshold0.00%
Thank you for the proposal, while we do think that the proposal itself presents a solid idea and does align with the broader direction our DAO has been supporting, particularly efforts that tie marketing with a clear funneling strategy to bridge sport fans with the ecosystem via wallet as a tool.
That said, given the existing presence of well-established wallets like Talisman, Nova, and the upcoming integration with Brave Wallet, our DAO members believe that it's becoming increasingly important to consider collaboration over duplication. This is from a cost-efficiency and ecosystem cohesion standpoint for the Treasury, exploring partnerships with current wallet providers might deliver more impact while preserving Treasury resources.
We encourage the team to consider engaging with existing wallet teams to potentially integrate their ideas or co-develop features, which could strengthen both the proposal and the broader ecosystem. REEEEEEEEEE DAO
Dear Proposer,
Thank you for your proposal. Our first vote on this proposal is NAY.
The Medium Spender track requires 50% quorum and simple majority of non-abstain voters according to our voting policy. This proposal has received three aye and five nay votes from ten members, with two members abstaining. Below is a summary of our members' comments:
The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.
Kind regards,
Permanence DAO