View All Small SpenderinSmall Spender
Beneficiary:(1.6K DOT)(587.11 DOT)
Requested:3.5K DOT
Executed
Untitled Post
4 months ago
This is a ReferendumV2 post. It can only be edited by the proposer of the post .
Comments (2)
Proposal Passed
3
of 3Summary
0%
Aye
0%
Nay
Aye (68)0.0 DOT
Support0.0 DOT
Nay (2)0.0 DOT
Voting Data
Approval%
Support%
Threshold0.00%
Threshold0.00%
Dear Proposer,
Thank you for your proposal. Our first vote on this proposal is AYE.
The Small Spender track requires 50% participation and simple majority of non-abstain voters according to our voting policy. This proposal has received five aye and zero nay votes from ten members. Below is a summary of our members' comments:
The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.
Kind regards,
Permanence DAO
I can confirm that the above bug was indeed something that happened, Parity/Fellowship has been busy cleaning up all the leftover pieces of it for around a year now. Since we have a precedence of reimbursing any loss of funds that happens due to core protocol bugs (and NO USER ACTION), I think this is a fair ask, ergo a yes from my side.