Strong NO, because:

• It gives Talisman advantages that other ecosystem participants have no. And other teams will come for the similar advantages and will ask for another 1-2-3M DOT, its not effective spending at all.
• 1M DOTs - guys, come on! Are you going to invite 1 billion new users to Polkadot? Or one user will cost 1-2K$?
• Operational costs 75k$ per month , and you are going to SELL all of this on the market on monthly basis? I think its better to wait for good times to invest 1M DOTs at better price.
• You are a commercial company, why 100% of your costs need to be covered by Polkadot treasury. Add more paid features for your users , use validators and staking to earn for the operational costs.
• "0.25 DOTs commission for each additional staked DOT bonded in a Talisman Nomination Pool" - 1/4 DOT for staking 1 DOT, what? this people will stake anyway , with Talisman or without , there are a lot of teams who can explain people how to stake without asking 0,25% for every dot they stake.
• "Any commission received by Talisman" - its Polkadot Network commission, not Talisman, what you are suggesting just crazy.
• The Talisman nomination pools - you can monitize your nomination pools as validators, it can be good reward for your hard work. This proposal will centralize Polkadot more, you already have 2 pools , and will have a resources to advertise more nomination pools its also not good. Diversity is the key for success for Polkadot.

- This proposal are steps to privatize Polkadot network according interest of one entity (Talisman) , don't like it. Its not a good idea at all.

Deleted Comment - Prev commented a reply to Promoteam without actually replying to their post.