Polkassembly Logo

Head 1
Head 3
Head 4
Head 2
Create Pencil IconCreate
TRACKS
ORIGINS
Report an issueNeed help with something?
Foot 1
Foot 2
Foot 3
Foot 4
OpenGov
View All Medium Spender
Requested:90.19K DOT
Executed

[Medium Spender] Referendum #1490

inMedium Spender
5 months ago
BeneficiaryBeneficiary:

(90.19K DOT)

Dear Community,

After collecting feedback from all DVs and community members, we have made substantial changes in our Educational & Outreach Track. As well as some changes in the other tracks.

These are the main changes compared to last year's top-up:

Image

Main numbers we've achieved in 2024:

Image

This referendum aims to top up the Anti-Scam Bounty, whose aim is to protect the community from scams by tracking/pruning scam activities, supporting scam victims, and promoting user safety via educational initiatives. The anti-scam bounty has been running for three years now and has helped fund multiple anti-scam tasks.

Spending Analysis and Budget Request

Requested allocation: $369,610 at 13/03/2025 EMA7 $4.098/DOT = 90,193 DOT

A general view of the bounty and spending analysis can be found here.

Thanks to some automation tools created by our members and our possible partnership with third parties, we have managed to lower the budget of our team by 46% as you can see below.

For more details, see the full table here.

Full details of this proposal, including what we have achieved so far, our future goals, and an estimated break-down of the requested top-up, can be found in the proposal document.

Comments (2)

4 months ago

is the same of the Moderation Bounty?

Screenshot 2025-04-08 at 17.12.41.png

4 months ago

Dear Proposer,

Thank you for your proposal. Our second vote on this proposal is AYE.

The Medium Spender track requires 50% quorum and simple majority of non-abstain voters according to our voting policy. This proposal has received five aye and four nay votes from ten members, with one member abstaining. Below is a summary of our members' comments:

In the referendum, opinions varied among voters regarding the revised proposal. Some expressed satisfaction with the adjustments made to the budget and acknowledged the team's responsiveness to community feedback, believing further optimizations were possible. Conversely, others felt uncomfortable supporting the proposal, citing concerns over past issues and the perceived lack of a clear return on investment. While a few voters abstained due to uncertainty, the overall sentiment reflected a desire for ongoing evaluation and potential refinement of the bounty's objectives and methods.

The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.

Kind regards,
Permanence DAO

PleaseLogin to comment

Proposal Passed

3

of 3

Summary

0%

Aye

AyeNay

0%

Nay

Aye (61)0.0 DOT

Support0.0 DOT

Nay (32)0.0 DOT

Voting Data

Approval%

Support%

Threshold0.00%

Threshold0.00%

Help Center

Report an Issue
Feedback
Terms and Conditions
Github

Our Services

Docs
Terms of Website
Privacy Policy

A House of Commons Initiative.

Polka Labs Private Limited 2025

All rights reserved.

Terms and ConditionsTerms of Website
Privacy Policy