View All Small SpenderinSmall Spender
Beneficiary:(27.55K USDT)
Requested:27.55K USDT
Rejected
Untitled Post
8 months ago
This is a ReferendumV2 post. It can only be edited by the proposer of the post .
Comments (3)
Confirmation Period
3
of 3Decision Period
28 / 28 days
Confirmation Period
0 / 2 days
Summary
0%
Aye
0%
Nay
Aye (26)0.0 DOT
Support0.0 DOT
Nay (48)0.0 DOT
Voting Data
Approval%
Support%
Threshold0.00%
Threshold0.00%
Good luck with the projects. I haven’t experienced them firsthand, but I’m sure you’re doing a great job with the in-person classes, events, etc..
In any case, I have a simple and straightforward question that could be answered in a single sentence, and it’s unrelated to top-ups math, or anything else mentioned so far: Why wasn’t the video content made public on YouTube from the start? Seriously, why not? What could have been the reason?
If the content is not public, it will never reach a wider audience. It is practically like throwing away all the potential value that this initiative could provide and isolating it within four walls or on a Discord server, it is the same thing.
Thanks in advance for your answer.
Thank you for your reply. At this point, these things still leave me speechless...
Well, those people who told you not to make the content material public from the beginning, honestly, I don't know who they can be, but they are definitely OpenGov, marketing and good practices criminals from now on in my eyes and in the eyes of anyone who is not blind or has the slightest idea of how to manage these type of initiatives.
Nonsenses like this are profoundly disheartening and leave me feeling overwhelmed. Really, just want to cry a little bit at this point xd.
Good luck with the project in any case. And please don't listen to those type of people again, for God's sake. Cheers!