Dear @Toma Sadova,

Thank you for your proposal. Our vote on this proposal is NAY.

The Big Spender track requires a 60% quorum according to our voting policy. This proposal has received three aye and two nay votes from ten members, with two members abstaining. Below is a summary of our members' comments:

The referendum received mixed feedback, with supporters praising the list of curators as trusted and capable of advancing ink! development. However, concerns were raised about past issues with the ink!ubator program, including a lack of professionalism and follow-through, leading some members to oppose the proposal. Others abstained, citing the need for a clearer strategy for broader ink! adoption. One member suggested that the bounty be closed in line with the outcome of referendum 1160 and reopened with a restructured approach.

The full discussion, along with individual members' votes and comments, can be found in our internal voting.

Kind regards,
Permanence DAO