hey, thank you for submitting this.

It would be good to have respected researchers in the field to comment on the necessity of the proposal. This would help me better make a decision.

I realize this isn’t directly related to the referendum itself, but you lost me at 'a 30% reward share of the savings incurred over 10 years once the economic impact of our proposal turns net-positive for the Polkadot/JAM ecosystem.'

Requesting over half a million dollars to build something, in addition to 41,504 DOT (which should arguably be requested in stablecoins, not $DOT which is highly volatile atm), and then asking for 30% of the reward share for 10 years feels overly greedy.

While funding innovation is important, proposals should balance ambition with fairness to the ecosystem and its stakeholders. A request of this scale, paired with such long-term financial commitments, risks setting a precedent that could deter future collaboration and responsible use of treasury funds.