Polkassembly Logo

Head 1
Head 3
Head 4
Head 2
Create Pencil IconCreate
TRACKS
ORIGINS
Report an issueNeed help with something?
Foot 1
Foot 2
Foot 3
Foot 4
OpenGov
View All Medium Spender
Requested:150.61K USDT
Executed

Untitled Post

inMedium Spender
9 months ago
BeneficiaryBeneficiary:

(150.61K USDT)

This is a ReferendumV2 post. It can only be edited by the proposer of the post .

Comments (4)

9 months ago

Quick question:
Why this dev is not included in the "standard" development roadmap of Xcavate?

Do you have a roadmap to share ?
Thx in advance.

9 months ago

Several questions coming to my mind:

  1. Why are Milestones 1.0 and 2.0 included in the proposal. It looks like to be standard research and planning that should be covered by Xcavate directly.

If you are not decided on the tech stack or if the design is not finalized, it could be seen as premature to go on OpenGov.
Feel free to clarify these 2 steps and why it should be covered by the Treasury.

  1. Have you try to reach W3F for funding?
    If yes, what was their answer.

  2. There is 1 missing point in the project brief, which is one key point of every proposal for the OG Tracker follow-up, what is the expected duration ?

Thx in advance.

Load more comments
PleaseLogin to comment

Proposal Passed

3

of 3

Summary

0%

Aye

AyeNay

0%

Nay

Aye (56)0.0 DOT

Support0.0 DOT

Nay (50)0.0 DOT

Voting Data

Approval%

Support%

Threshold0.00%

Threshold0.00%

Help Center

Report an Issue
Feedback
Terms and Conditions
Github

Our Services

Docs
Terms of Website
Privacy Policy

A House of Commons Initiative.

Polka Labs Private Limited 2025

All rights reserved.

Terms and ConditionsTerms of Website
Privacy Policy