View All Medium SpenderinMedium Spender
Beneficiary:(64.31K DOT)
Requested:64.31K DOT
Rejected
Untitled Post
10 months ago
This is a ReferendumV2 post. It can only be edited by the proposer of the post .
Comments (5)
Confirmation Period
3
of 3Decision Period
28 / 28 days
Confirmation Period
0 / 4 days
Summary
0%
Aye
0%
Nay
Aye (71)0.0 DOT
Support0.0 DOT
Nay (55)0.0 DOT
Voting Data
Approval%
Support%
Threshold0.00%
Threshold0.00%
Have you considered investing in a proper UI redesign? I've tried using the extension for a bit and it seems quite robust, but the user-experience based on design is just really subpar. It's clearly been both designed and developed by a team of back-end developers which shows in good functionality but poor UX..
The UI is crowded, has inconsistent to unreadable font sizing and font-family usage, inconsistent use of icons / CTA, headers inside of headers inside of headers (see pool staking page) and no clear hierarchy.
You've clearly put effort into the extension, but for the community to pay over $250k is tough with sleek alternatives like Nova wallet and Talisman. Personally if I were to introduce a new user to the Polkadot ecosystem I would hesitate to show them PolkaGate. I don't want to be overly harsh or mean but in all honesty the extension looks more like a student's hobby project than something which over $250.000 has been invested into which sours the proposal. I don't think in it's current form PolkaGate has a spot among the competition or can provide much added value to the ecosystem.
lol he won't answer the first basic question he was asked... nay