Just to clarify, you’re asking for $200K for about 60 days of work, which comes out to ~$3,333 per day. But from what I can tell, this integration primarily seems to benefit your company more than Polkadot, so it feels a bit unfair to expect Polkadot to fund this initiative.

Realistically, your company will likely need to incorporate Polkadot data regardless—especially with JAM on the horizon, where investors will almost certainly expect to see DOTk metrics included in your offering. So, framing this as though Polkadot needs this to pass more than the other way around seems a bit off.

Going to vote NAY simply because your company should be footing the bill here, not vice versa.

Also, small note—most people are calling them rollups now, not parachains.

Dear @ArtemisAnalytics,

Thank you for your proposal. Our vote on this proposal is NAY. Below is a summary of our members' comments:

This proposal received mixed feedback. While some members acknowledged Artemis Analytics as a valuable platform endorsed by the Parity Data Team, others felt the timing and cost were not justified. Suggestions included revisiting the proposal at a lower price point and potentially delaying until Q1 2025. Despite these reservations, supporters emphasized the importance of integrating Polkadot into key data platforms to increase visibility.

The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.

Kind regards,
Permanence DAO