View All Small SpenderinSmall Spender
Beneficiary:(42K USDT)
Requested:42K USDT
Executed
Untitled Post
10 months ago
Beneficiary:This is a ReferendumV2 post. It can only be edited by the proposer of the post .
Comments (8)
Proposal Passed
3
of 3Summary
0%
Aye
0%
Nay
Aye (57)0.0 DOT
Support0.0 DOT
Nay (36)0.0 DOT
Voting Data
Approval%
Support%
Threshold0.00%
Threshold0.00%
nice initiative :) very nice POAP use case, I have been looking for some POAP solution on Polkadot for a while and this solves it!
I have some serious concerns after looking into your full proposal document (linked at the top of your referendum).
Specifically the FIRST example you provide for Penn State University (PSU): Created 200 unique digital memories, with 9 claimed so far.
The problem is, the link you provide in your document takes you to your website showing NFTs not for Penn State University as you claim, but rather Prince of Songkla University in Songkhla, Thailand.
This is a glaring mistake that anyone should be able to spot that is asking for funds, and this makes me wonder...
How does this even happen, and what other mistakes are riddled throughout this half-baked proposal?
Did you use ChatGPT to generate the proposal and didn't re-read?
...or is this a more serious case of being intentionally misleading to generate more support for a tool that is barely being used today?