View All Medium SpenderinMedium Spender
Beneficiary:(240K USDT)
Requested:240K USDT
Rejected
Untitled Post
a year ago
This is a ReferendumV2 post. It can only be edited by the proposer of the post .
Comments (5)
Confirmation Period
3
of 3Decision Period
28 / 28 days
Confirmation Period
0 / 4 days
Summary
0%
Aye
0%
Nay
Aye (28)0.0 DOT
Support0.0 DOT
Nay (78)0.0 DOT
Voting Data
Approval%
Support%
Threshold0.00%
Threshold0.00%
Hello - I do not have a financial relationship with Bitcoin.com, but I met the team earlier this year and have been helping Ben and Jeff with the treasury proposal process and onboarding into the Polkadot ecosystem (e.g. going through the treasury proposal process, getting the accounts in order, etc.).
It should be noted that while the account appears as "single signatory account" and "unverified" on Polkassembly, it is actually a (deterministic) multisig with a subidentity set rather than an identity.
Requesting nearly $250,000 to sponsor a small publication that already targets Polkadot's audience, without a clear plan for the funds or measurable impact, is a waste of treasury resources.
This proposal is so poorly thought out and outside the norm for niche sponsorship contract values that it's not even worth considering.
Nay.