Polkassembly Logo

Head 1
Head 3
Head 4
Head 2
Create Pencil IconCreate
TRACKS
ORIGINS
Report an issueNeed help with something?
Foot 1
Foot 2
Foot 3
Foot 4
OpenGov
View All Medium Spender
Requested:240K USDT
Rejected

Untitled Post

inMedium Spender
a year ago
BeneficiaryBeneficiary:

(240K USDT)

This is a ReferendumV2 post. It can only be edited by the proposer of the post .

Comments (5)

a year ago

Hello - I do not have a financial relationship with Bitcoin.com, but I met the team earlier this year and have been helping Ben and Jeff with the treasury proposal process and onboarding into the Polkadot ecosystem (e.g. going through the treasury proposal process, getting the accounts in order, etc.).

It should be noted that while the account appears as "single signatory account" and "unverified" on Polkassembly, it is actually a (deterministic) multisig with a subidentity set rather than an identity.

Screenshot 2024-10-15 at 9.03.43 AM.png

a year ago

Requesting nearly $250,000 to sponsor a small publication that already targets Polkadot's audience, without a clear plan for the funds or measurable impact, is a waste of treasury resources.

This proposal is so poorly thought out and outside the norm for niche sponsorship contract values that it's not even worth considering.

Nay.

Load more comments
PleaseLogin to comment

Confirmation Period

3

of 3

Decision Period

28 / 28 days

Confirmation Period

0 / 4 days

Summary

0%

Aye

AyeNay

0%

Nay

Aye (28)0.0 DOT

Support0.0 DOT

Nay (78)0.0 DOT

Voting Data

Approval%

Support%

Threshold0.00%

Threshold0.00%

Help Center

Report an Issue
Feedback
Terms and Conditions
Github

Our Services

Docs
Terms of Website
Privacy Policy

A House of Commons Initiative.

Polka Labs Private Limited 2025

All rights reserved.

Terms and ConditionsTerms of Website
Privacy Policy