Polkassembly Logo

Head 1
Head 3
Head 4
Head 2
Create Pencil IconCreate
TRACKS
ORIGINS
Report an issueNeed help with something?
Foot 1
Foot 2
Foot 3
Foot 4
OpenGov
View All Treasurer
Executed

Untitled Post

inTreasurer
a year ago

This is a ReferendumV2 post. It can only be edited by the proposer of the post .

Comments (11)

a year ago

Once a wise man said "you will always fail if you learn nothing from the past".
Somehow, this proposal manages to do even worst.

a year ago

Dear proposers,
Here is a list of concerns on which the community would highly appreciate a feedback.
Thank you so much in advance!

  • What are the lesson learnt from this bounty's past failures?
  • This scheme has a legend "no pay" but there's literally no one tagged with it. Why?
    image.png
  • How many hours per paid members are expected to be spent each month? Please provide estimates
  • Some rates seem inappropriate compared to skill fit for the job, how do you explain that?
  • Ethics: it is public knowledge that some members have notoriously disrespected ethic rules in the past. How do you proceed to enforce these rules, especially regarding conflict of interests?
  • What will be the structure of unethical behavior review process? What can trigger this review process? Self evaluation or anything else?
  • What will be the process to seek and evaluate competition between contractors?
  • There is one curator missing in the letters of intent, who is this person and what are his intentions?
Load more comments
PleaseLogin to comment

Proposal Passed

3

of 3

Summary

0%

Aye

AyeNay

0%

Nay

Aye (71)0.0 DOT

Support0.0 DOT

Nay (140)0.0 DOT

Voting Data

Approval%

Support%

Threshold0.00%

Threshold0.00%

Help Center

Report an Issue
Feedback
Terms and Conditions
Github

Our Services

Docs
Terms of Website
Privacy Policy

A House of Commons Initiative.

Polka Labs Private Limited 2025

All rights reserved.

Terms and ConditionsTerms of Website
Privacy Policy