I believe we really should ask ourselves if we need to have another wallet fully funded by the Polkadot treasury. Looking at the Android store the app so far has 100+ downloads which isn't much. The UI-design really does not meet standards and is unable to match others such as Novawallet or Talisman.

Your rates seem fair for the amount of work, but I do not see how spending $24.000 for NFT-support for an app with just a handful of downloads will result in a worthy return on investment. Furthermore, there are already plently of other options out there.

We would like to publicly support PlutoWallet's referendum with our rationale.
We believe that there are three the core areas on Polkadot require attention and improvements. The wallet ecosystem, the DeFi ecosystem and the explorer ecosystem. This will address the 1st area.

Comparatively with other ecosystems, the Polkadot wallet ecosystem still needs to mature. On other chains, wallets have different UIs and experiences which is also one of the ways of on-boarding users, by giving them flexibility on what to pick for their daily on-chain experience. On this regard we agree heavily with Rosta that teams and devs should be free to innovate into different directions, specially with one that users and developers will have to use on a day to day basis.

Them being PBA alumni is also a big plus as they are high quality talent and more often than not, are poached by other ecosystems for very good reasons.

For this reason. We will support this referendum and continuations of this referendum.