Polkassembly Logo

Head 1
Head 3
Head 4
Head 2
Create Pencil IconCreate
TRACKS
ORIGINS
Report an issueNeed help with something?
Foot 1
Foot 2
Foot 3
Foot 4
OpenGov
View All Small Tipper
Requested:10 DOT
Executed

Polkadot OpenGov TOP-UP KILLER: utility.batch treasury.spends with USDC + USDT

inSmall Tipper
a year ago
BeneficiaryBeneficiary:

(10 DOT)

This video details how Polkadot OpenGov proposers can use utility.batch with treasury.spend call with USDC + USDT! Its meant to inform proposers and OpenGov voters.

  • Video: utility.batch treasury.spends with USDC + USDT
  • Slides: utility.batch treasury.spends with USDC + USDT
  • Cheat Sheet: utility.batch treasury.spends with USDC + USDT

Instead of using EMA7+EMA30 guesswork (which predictably gets unpredictable results, especially this week 😅) and asking for annoying topups later when DOT falls, this process saves everyone from all that guesswork and gets stable results.

Instead of proposers getting paid everything up front (too risky for OpenGov Treasury) or paid retroactively if it passes (too risky for proposer), proposers can deliver milestone by milestone with this FAIR utility.batch.

If proposers fail to deliver, OpenGov can use treasury.voidSpend to cancel the proposal execution.

This means: NO MORE TOP UPS!

We hope someone will make a better video but I think its urgent that everyone know about and use this for efficient Treasury spends.

It was motivated by the realization that most people believe that most people proposing aren't DOT Missionaries through the interactions here.

Comments (1)

a year ago

Thank you! Definitely needed to split payments, for accountability. Is not enough though: people will need to follow up on each proposal down the line, which is not easy! We may need a website UI to do so easily...

Regarding stables, I don't agree with paying with stablecoins until we don't have revenues directly in them (ie. accumulate fees in them), otherwise if Polkadot treasury sells DOT itself, no one will ever buy it and it would drop quickly.

PleaseLogin to comment

Proposal Passed

3

of 3

Summary

0%

Aye

AyeNay

0%

Nay

Aye (19)0.0 DOT

Support0.0 DOT

Nay (7)0.0 DOT

Voting Data

Approval%

Support%

Threshold0.00%

Threshold0.00%

Help Center

Report an Issue
Feedback
Terms and Conditions
Github

Our Services

Docs
Terms of Website
Privacy Policy

A House of Commons Initiative.

Polka Labs Private Limited 2025

All rights reserved.

Terms and ConditionsTerms of Website
Privacy Policy