Polkassembly Logo

Head 1
Head 3
Head 4
Head 2
Create Pencil IconCreate
TRACKS
ORIGINS
Report an issueNeed help with something?
Foot 1
Foot 2
Foot 3
Foot 4
OpenGov
View All Big Spender
Requested:400K DOT
Rejected

Polkadot Growth Initiative (PGI)

inBig Spender
a year ago
BeneficiaryBeneficiary:

(400K DOT)

Dear all,

we shared the Polkadot Growth Initiative (PGI) in the Polkadot forum on the 9th of July, with over 535 views and 31 replies. The post received great input on how to improve the initial PGI concept, which we've incorporated.

From the initial Polkadot forum post to the treasury proposal (Referenda: 1,039) the investment threshold for the PGI was raised from initially 23.33% to 33.33% of the funding target of a raising project, following inputs from the discussion in the Polkadot forum with the community.

The PGI is meant to be a success booster without lowering the threshold for projects to pass the raise.

Ultimately, the PGI’s value proposition is to help fund promising projects coming to Polkadot and increase their probability of success. DOT holders benefit directly through the usage of more blockspace by those teams, and hence increased coretime sales, and indirectly by starting a positive flywheel effect once the first success stories helped by the PGI emerge.

Polkadot Forum Post:
https://forum.polkadot.network/t/polkadot-growth-initiative-pgi/9028

Proposal Document:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nx-M5QAnqEkCD5d082BrKI3ISn5YjAK4rNAk4WnMhgo/

Update on 5.8.2024:
The PGI will not seek a top up to account for the difference in USD payments.

The PGI is a success booster for Polkadot ecosystem projects to support the ecosystem in the best possible path forward. Project funding and the primary markets are strongly correlated to market movements as is the PGI’s allocation which goes in line with its 10% fixed co-investment in deals reaching the 33% funding target from external investors.

Comments (2)

a year ago

Agreed with Shawn and ezio - clarification on how this benefits Polimec will be great, but can we get more details and who and how this large amount if DOT will be managed? .

So, who is proposing and will be managing this on behalf of Polimec? Can you give more details on how the DOT will be used - how that benefits or creates value for Polkadot/Parachains, and who is making those decisions and any experience or track record?

Thank you.

a year ago

From a marketing perspective, this would be something we from Distractive could use very well to tip the sentiment among VCs and startups in a much more positive direction.

We have a few questions (sorry if this has already been answered in the proposal).

  1. What is your treasury strategy? Will you swap the 400k DOT directly into Polymec tokens?
  2. Will you require the whole sum initially or use/invest it in tranches?
  3. How does your approach differ from Scytale to grow the ecosystem? We already have a VC arm funded by the treasury (Yes, I understand your idea would work more like a VC boost than a traditional VC). The difference I see is the decentralized investing decision-making process by the Polimec community and greater diversity.

Cheers!

PleaseLogin to comment

Confirmation Period

3

of 3

Decision Period

28 / 28 days

Confirmation Period

0 / 7 days

Summary

0%

Aye

AyeNay

0%

Nay

Aye (47)0.0 DOT

Support0.0 DOT

Nay (43)0.0 DOT

Voting Data

Approval%

Support%

Threshold0.00%

Threshold0.00%

Help Center

Report an Issue
Feedback
Terms and Conditions
Github

Our Services

Docs
Terms of Website
Privacy Policy

A House of Commons Initiative.

Polka Labs Private Limited 2025

All rights reserved.

Terms and ConditionsTerms of Website
Privacy Policy